The unique problem · The Renewal Trap

The renewal quote tells you what staying costs.
Not what leaving costs.

And neither number answers the real question: what is actually best for your infrastructure, and where is the maximum return on that investment? Sometimes the answer is PostgreSQL or SQL Server. Sometimes it’s a managed cloud flavour. And sometimes the best-ROI answer is staying exactly where you are — on Oracle, renegotiated and right-sized.

We don’t sell the exit. We sell the answer — including ‘stay’, when that’s what the evidence says.

The failure mode is always the same: the platform gets chosen from a slide, the migration vendor calls it routine, and the truth arrives after cutover — the rewrite was three times bigger, the batch runs slower, the feature you depended on has no equivalent. By then the migration vendor is gone. They were paid for the move, not the outcome.

Leaving for the wrong target destroys ROI as surely as overpaying to stay. The only way to know which side of that line your estate is on: count the objects, run the workload on the real candidates, and put the numbers side by side — staying included.

What the business case sees

Licence savings · obvious on paper
Target platform · “they all say it’s routine”

— not in the spreadsheet —

!Every option, a different riskPostgreSQL, SQL Server, Aurora, managed flavours — and staying. The spreadsheet prices them the same. Your workload won’t.
!PL/SQL rewrite surfaceNobody has counted the objects. You can’t price what you haven’t measured.
!The way backIf the target disappoints, the migration vendor is gone — and the return trip has no budget line.

Why teams skip the feasibility check

Every reason to skip it
is a reason you need it

Three things teams tell themselves before leaving Oracle — and why each one is the trap, not the shortcut.

Licence math

"Postgres is free — the business case writes itself."

The vendor’s word

"The migration vendor says it’s routine."

Decide first

"We’ll decide now and analyse during the migration."

What we do instead

Count it. Run it. Compare it — staying included.

We count your PL/SQL surface object by object, run your workload on the real candidate platforms, and put the numbers side by side — including the renegotiated cost of staying on Oracle. Every figure measured on your estate, with the limits of each test stated. Always verified. Never assumed.

The stakes

You’re not signing off on a migration.
You’re signing off on a business case.

The board approved five-year savings, built on three numbers nobody has measured: the size of the rewrite, the speed of the target, and the cost of being wrong. The savings are the only line anyone checked — because it came from the invoice.

An estimate is not a measurement.

"About 20% of the PL/SQL will need rework" is a sentence with no evidence behind it. Nobody knows the rewrite surface until every object is counted and classified — translates cleanly, needs rework, or has no equivalent on the target. Until then, the biggest cost line in the business case is a guess wearing a suit.

The five-year math flips on one bad number.

The licence savings are real. So is the risk that eats them: a batch that runs 40% slower, a rewrite that triples, a feature replaced by six months of custom code. Any one of those turns the business case negative — and none of them shows up until someone runs your workload on the actual target.

The way back has no budget line.

If the target disappoints after cutover, the migration vendor is gone — paid for the move, not the outcome. Migrating back costs more than migrating out, and explaining it to the board costs more than both. Nobody plans the return trip, which is exactly why it’s the most expensive journey in enterprise IT.

What we do instead

Measure the business case. Then sign it.

That’s the whole job: every number in the case measured on your estate — the rewrite counted object by object, the workload timed on the real candidates, the cost of staying priced in. Before you commit, not after. Not because leaving is wrong — but because signing a case you haven’t measured is.

Product · 02

Database Platform Feasibility Assessment

A clear, evidence-based verdict on whether to leave Oracle and what it would really cost — including ‘stay on Oracle,’ when that’s what the evidence says.

Targets: PostgreSQL · SQL Server · cloud-managed

For you if you’re weighing a move off Oracle — and want the honest answer before you commit.

Every assessment is led and signed off by a senior Oracle DBA — 10+ years in production. The verdict is never delegated.

What you'll get — five deliverables

Select a deliverable to exploreTap a deliverable to explore

What we do

We count your PL/SQL surface object by object and classify it per candidate — translates cleanly, needs rework, no equivalent. Then we run your actual workload on the shortlisted targets and time it, and we price the renegotiated cost of staying on Oracle alongside. Read-only on your estate; nothing is touched in production. You receive numbers measured on your systems — not industry averages.

What this will feel like

Somewhere in week two, a number will disagree with the business case — a rewrite bigger than the slide said, or a batch slower than the vendor promised. That moment is uncomfortable. It is also the entire reason you hired us: better in a report before you sign than in production after cutover. And one rule holds for the entire engagement: you can stop it at any point, for any reason. Everything verified up to that moment is documented — and it’s yours.

You can stop here. Fixed scope and fixed price, in writing, before this starts. Nothing runs until you approve it.

What we do

We count your PL/SQL surface object by object and classify it per candidate — translates cleanly, needs rework, no equivalent. Then we run your actual workload on the shortlisted targets and time it, and we price the renegotiated cost of staying on Oracle alongside. Read-only on your estate; nothing is touched in production. You receive numbers measured on your systems — not industry averages.

What this will feel like

Somewhere in week two, a number will disagree with the business case — a rewrite bigger than the slide said, or a batch slower than the vendor promised. That moment is uncomfortable. It is also the entire reason you hired us: better in a report before you sign than in production after cutover. And one rule holds for the entire engagement: you can stop it at any point, for any reason. Everything verified up to that moment is documented — and it’s yours.

You can stop here. Fixed scope and fixed price, in writing, before this starts. Nothing runs until you approve it.

How the engagement runs

01

Read-only discovery.

Your DBA sees every query we run. Production is never touched.

02

Reproduction on a replica.

Findings become evidence instead of opinions — with a short note after each session.

03

The verdict session.

Go/no-go, the evidence behind it, and the roadmap — walked through live, with your team in the room.

Timeline is set at scoping, in writing, with the quote — it scales with your estate, not with our calendar.

Get started

The scoping call —
what actually happens

60 minutes. Free. No pitch. You talk to the senior DBA who would run your assessment — not a salesperson.

01

What to bring

Your Oracle version(s), rough estate size, and your deadline. That’s enough.

02

What happens on the call

We ask about your migration window, your known risks, and what ‘verified’ needs to mean in your environment. You ask anything — including how we’d handle your specific setup.

03

What you leave with

A straight answer on whether this assessment fits your situation — including ‘it doesn’t.’ If it doesn’t, we say so on the call and you’ve lost an hour, not a budget.

We don’t assume — we reproduce.
We tell you what we couldn’t test.
Your name stays off our website.
Independent of Oracle.